Cooperative Research Units
Education, Research And Technical Assistance For Managing Our Natural Resources
Home | Intranet | Digital Measures | Help

Assessing the effects of USDA conservation practices on wetland ecosystem services in CA's Central Valley

Wetland

Duration

September 2006 - August 2011

Narrative

The California Central Valley (CCV) was historically an ecosystem consisting of grassland, prairie, and oak-grass savanna habitats. Interspersed within these primary habitats were riparian woodland, freshwater marsh, and vernal pool wetlands. These wetlands were integral in supporting the diverse flora and fauna of the historic CCV. Riparian forest wetlands supported many neotropical migratory birds, Chinook salmon and other woodland associated species. Freshwater marshes in the CCV once supported enormous populations of wintering waterfowl, while vernal pool wetlands supported unique plant and invertebrate communities.

Most, if not all, these habitats in the CCV have been altered by human activity. Area of wetland habitats in the CCV prior to 1900 has been estimated to be 1.6-2.0 million ha. In the 1980's, wetland area in the CCV had been reduced to 153,000 ha. Human activities leading to wetland loss in the CCV are many and varied, but agricultural development and urbanization are chief among them.

The USDA, Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) administers a variety of programs intended to assist farmers and ranchers in addressing natural resource concerns on private lands. Among these programs is the Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) which focuses on restoring degraded wetlands or those that have been converted to agricultural production. In California, NRCS has focused their WRP activities on restoring a variety of wetlands, including seasonal wetlands, semi-permanent marshes, vernal pools, riparian and tidally-influenced wetlands. Recent information suggests that at least 52 CCV wetlands totaling more than 11,000 ha have been at least partially restored.

The NRCS initiated an assessment of the effects of conservation practices on wetland ecosystem services. This conservation effects assessment of wetland ecosystems (CEAP-Wetlands) objectives are to:
Produce estimates of wetland ecosystem services,
Quantify effects (of agriculture on wetlands), with and without implementation of USDA conservation practices,
Develop predictive wetland functional condition indicator models,
Quantify and compare effects of alternative environmental or program scenarios on regional wetland services, and
Develop scientific and technological tools that improve the sustainability of wetlands on agricultural landscapes.

CEAP-Wetland assessments will be conducted in 10 regions throughout the coterminous United States (USDA-NRCS 2006) and the CCV is one of these regions. The research described here supports the CEAP-Wetland assessment in the CCV.

Objectives:
1. Organize and conduct a regional workshop involving multiple agencies and collaborators. The purpose of this workshop will be to identify ecosystem functions and services most important in CCV wetlands.
2. Complete preliminary research to identify and select wetland assessment sampling sites to be used in a CCV wetlands assessment.
3. Develop a study plan for completing a CEAP-Wetlands assessment of the CCV.

Research Products and Activities

Peer Reviewed Publications

  • Duffy, W.G., Kahara, S.N. and Records, R.M., eds., 2011, Conservation Effects Assessment Project-Wetlands assessment in California's Central Valley and Upper Klamath River Basin: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1290, 128 p. Abstract |  Download  |  Publisher Website | 
 

Current Staff

Federal Staff: 102

Masters Students: 247

Phd Students: 163

Post Docs: 55

University Staff: 266

5 Year Summary

Students graduated: 722

Scientific Publications: 1960

Presentations: 4355

 

Personnel

  • Walter DuffyPrincipal Investigator
  • Sharon KaharaCo-Principal Investigator
  • Rosemary RecordsStaff

Funding Agencies

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service

Links

Cooperative Research Units Program Headquarters Cooperators